Last updated: 2019-09-09
Checks: 7 0
Knit directory: W_shredder/
This reproducible R Markdown analysis was created with workflowr (version 1.4.0). The Checks tab describes the reproducibility checks that were applied when the results were created. The Past versions tab lists the development history.
Great! Since the R Markdown file has been committed to the Git repository, you know the exact version of the code that produced these results.
Great job! The global environment was empty. Objects defined in the global environment can affect the analysis in your R Markdown file in unknown ways. For reproduciblity it’s best to always run the code in an empty environment.
The command set.seed(20180716)
was run prior to running the code in the R Markdown file. Setting a seed ensures that any results that rely on randomness, e.g. subsampling or permutations, are reproducible.
Great job! Recording the operating system, R version, and package versions is critical for reproducibility.
Nice! There were no cached chunks for this analysis, so you can be confident that you successfully produced the results during this run.
Great job! Using relative paths to the files within your workflowr project makes it easier to run your code on other machines.
Great! You are using Git for version control. Tracking code development and connecting the code version to the results is critical for reproducibility. The version displayed above was the version of the Git repository at the time these results were generated.
Note that you need to be careful to ensure that all relevant files for the analysis have been committed to Git prior to generating the results (you can use wflow_publish
or wflow_git_commit
). workflowr only checks the R Markdown file, but you know if there are other scripts or data files that it depends on. Below is the status of the Git repository when the results were generated:
Ignored files:
Ignored: .DS_Store
Ignored: .Rhistory
Ignored: .Rproj.user/
Ignored: Proc_B_manuscript/.DS_Store
Ignored: code/.DS_Store
Ignored: data/
Ignored: figures/.DS_Store
Ignored: output/
Untracked files:
Untracked: .gitignore
Unstaged changes:
Modified: figures/fig_4_inset.pdf
Note that any generated files, e.g. HTML, png, CSS, etc., are not included in this status report because it is ok for generated content to have uncommitted changes.
These are the previous versions of the R Markdown and HTML files. If you’ve configured a remote Git repository (see ?wflow_git_remote
), click on the hyperlinks in the table below to view them.
File | Version | Author | Date | Message |
---|---|---|---|---|
Rmd | 12cf147 | lukeholman | 2019-09-09 | almost done |
html | 9f1c407 | lukeholman | 2019-09-09 | Build site. |
Rmd | 3041bd8 | lukeholman | 2019-09-09 | First commit |
html | 3041bd8 | lukeholman | 2019-09-09 | First commit |
analysis/model_functions.Rmd
source_rmd <- function(file){
options(knitr.duplicate.label = "allow")
tempR <- tempfile(tmpdir = ".", fileext = ".R")
on.exit(unlink(tempR))
knitr::purl(file, output = tempR, quiet = TRUE)
source(tempR, local = globalenv())
}
source_rmd("analysis/model_functions.Rmd")
custom_functions <- ls()
Here, we define the possible parameter ranges, which we will sample from using Latin hypercube sampling. For this first parameter space, the parameter ranges span most/all of the sensible range.
parameter_ranges_1 <- data.frame(
release_size = c(10, 100),
release_strategy = c(0, 1), # binary variable: local or global release
W_shredding_rate = c(0.4, 1), # p-shred in the paper
Z_conversion_rate = c(0, 1), # p-conv in the paper
Zr_creation_rate = c(0, 0.1), # p-nhej in the paper
Zr_mutation_rate = c(0.0, 0.00001), # mu-Z
Wr_mutation_rate = c(0.0, 0.00001), # mu-W
cost_Zdrive_female = c(0, 0.6), # Cost of Z* to female fecundity
cost_Zdrive_male = c(0, 0.6), # Cost of Z* to male mating success
male_migration_prob = c(0.001, 0.5),
female_migration_prob = c(0.001, 0.5),
migration_type = c(0, 1), # binary variable: do migrants move to next door patch, or a random patch anywhere in the world?
n_patches = c(2, 50), # integer number of patches
max_fecundity = c(10, 1000), # r in the paper
softness = c(0, 1), # psi in the paper
male_weighting = c(0.1, 1.9), # delta in the paper
density_dependence_shape = c(0.1, 1.9), # alpha in the paper
initial_A = c(0, 1),
initial_B = c(0, 1)
)
For this second parameter space, we assume that the W-shredding rate (\(p_{shred}\)) is 1, while all other parameter ranges span most/all of the sensible range, same as before.
parameter_ranges_2 <- data.frame(
release_size = c(10, 100),
release_strategy = c(0, 1), # binary variable: local or global release
W_shredding_rate = c(0, 1), # p-shred in the paper
Z_conversion_rate = c(0, 1), # p-conv in the paper
Zr_creation_rate = c(0, 0.1), # p-nhej in the paper
Zr_mutation_rate = c(0.0, 0.00001), # mu-Z
Wr_mutation_rate = c(0.0, 0.00001), # mu-W
cost_Zdrive_female = c(0, 0.6), # Cost of Z* to female fecundity
cost_Zdrive_male = c(0, 0.6), # Cost of Z* to male mating success
male_migration_prob = c(0.001, 0.5),
female_migration_prob = c(0.001, 0.5),
migration_type = c(0, 1), # binary variable: do migrants move to next door patch, or a random patch anywhere in the world?
n_patches = c(2, 50), # integer number of patches
max_fecundity = c(10, 1000), # r in the paper
softness = c(0, 1), # psi in the paper
male_weighting = c(0.1, 1.9), # delta in the paper
density_dependence_shape = c(0.1, 1.9), # alpha in the paper
initial_A = c(0, 1),
initial_B = c(0, 1)
) %>% mutate(W_shredding_rate = 1)
For this third parameter space, we assume that females carrying the W-shredder are sterile, so cost_Zdrive_female
(\(c_f\)) is 1. The W-shredding rate (\(p_{shred}\)), and the initial frequency of the shredding resistance allele A, is also fixed (this doesn’t affect the model since \(Z^*\) females don’t breed). All other parameter ranges span most/all of the sensible range, same as before.
parameter_ranges_3 <- data.frame(
release_size = c(10, 100),
release_strategy = c(0, 1), # binary variable: local or global release
W_shredding_rate = c(0, 1), # p-shred in the paper
Z_conversion_rate = c(0, 1), # p-conv in the paper
Zr_creation_rate = c(0, 0.1), # p-nhej in the paper
Zr_mutation_rate = c(0.0, 0.00001), # mu-Z
Wr_mutation_rate = c(0.0, 0.00001), # mu-W
cost_Zdrive_female = c(0, 1), # Cost of Z* to female fecundity
cost_Zdrive_male = c(0, 0.6), # Cost of Z* to male mating success
male_migration_prob = c(0.001, 0.5),
female_migration_prob = c(0.001, 0.5),
migration_type = c(0, 1), # binary variable: do migrants move to next door patch, or a random patch anywhere in the world?
n_patches = c(2, 50), # integer number of patches
max_fecundity = c(10, 1000), # r in the paper
softness = c(0, 1), # psi in the paper
male_weighting = c(0.1, 1.9), # delta in the paper
density_dependence_shape = c(0.1, 1.9), # alpha in the paper
initial_A = c(0, 1),
initial_B = c(0, 1)
) %>% mutate(W_shredding_rate = 0,
initial_A = 0,
cost_Zdrive_female = 1)
For this fourth parameter space, we assume that females carrying the W-shredder are sterile, so cost_Zdrive_female
(\(c_f\)) is 1. The W-shredding rate (\(p_{shred}\)), and the initial frequency of the shredding resistance allele A, is also fixed (this doesn’t affect the model since \(Z^*\) females don’t breed). All other parameter ranges span most/all of the sensible range as for the third space, with some exceptions. All parameters that affect resistance were set to zero, to give the female-sterilising drive a better chance to work.
parameter_ranges_4 <- data.frame(
release_size = c(10, 100),
release_strategy = c(0, 1), # binary variable: local or global release
W_shredding_rate = c(0, 1), # p-shred in the paper
Z_conversion_rate = c(0, 1), # p-conv in the paper
Zr_creation_rate = c(0, 0.1), # p-nhej in the paper
Zr_mutation_rate = c(0.0, 0.00001), # mu-Z
Wr_mutation_rate = c(0.0, 0.00001), # mu-W
cost_Zdrive_female = c(0, 1), # Cost of Z* to female fecundity
cost_Zdrive_male = c(0, 0.6), # Cost of Z* to male mating success
male_migration_prob = c(0.001, 0.5),
female_migration_prob = c(0.001, 0.5),
migration_type = c(0, 1), # binary variable: do migrants move to next door patch, or a random patch anywhere in the world?
n_patches = c(2, 50), # integer number of patches
max_fecundity = c(10, 1000), # r in the paper
softness = c(0, 1), # psi in the paper
male_weighting = c(0.1, 1.9), # delta in the paper
density_dependence_shape = c(0.1, 1.9), # alpha in the paper
initial_A = c(0, 1),
initial_B = c(0, 1)
) %>% mutate(W_shredding_rate = 0,
initial_A = 0,
cost_Zdrive_female = 1,
Zr_creation_rate = 0, # No resistance to male gene drive this time
Zr_mutation_rate = 0,
initial_B = 0)
do_lhs <- function(parameter_ranges, n_samples){
n_parameters <- ncol(parameter_ranges)
X <- randomLHS(n_samples, n_parameters)
for(i in 1:n_parameters){
X[,i] <- parameter_ranges[1, i] +
(parameter_ranges[2, i] - parameter_ranges[1, i]) * X[, i]
}
colnames(X) <- colnames(parameter_ranges)
# Make integers where needed, and create the binary variables
as.data.frame(X) %>%
mutate(n_patches = round(n_patches),
release_size = round(release_size),
release_strategy = ifelse(release_strategy < 0.5, "one_patch", "all_patches"),
migration_type = ifelse(migration_type < 0.5, "local", "global"),
initial_A = ifelse(initial_A < 0.5, 0, 0.05),
initial_B = ifelse(initial_B < 0.5, 0, 0.05),
cost_Wr = 0,
cost_Zr = 0,
cost_A = 0,
cost_B = 0,
carrying_capacity = 10000,
initial_pop_size = 10000,
initial_Zdrive = 0,
initial_Zr = 0.00,
initial_Wr = 0.00,
realisations = 1, # change to e.g. 1:100 for replication
generations = 1000,
burn_in = 50
)
}
n_parameter_spaces <- 10^6
print(paste("Sampling", n_parameter_spaces, "parameter spaces from a Latin hypercube..."))
set.seed(12345)
parameters <- rbind(
do_lhs(parameter_ranges_1, 2 * n_parameter_spaces),
do_lhs(parameter_ranges_2, n_parameter_spaces),
do_lhs(parameter_ranges_3, n_parameter_spaces),
do_lhs(parameter_ranges_4, n_parameter_spaces)
)
# shuffle to equalise workload across CPUs
parameters <- parameters[sample(nrow(parameters)), ]
print("...finished sampling. Launching SLURM job...")
chunk_size <- 1000
cpus <- 1
sopt <- list(time = '80:00:00', # max run time per node in hours
mem = '32768') # 32GB memory per node
chunks <- split(1:nrow(parameters),
ceiling(seq_along(1:nrow(parameters)) / chunk_size))
number_of_chunks <- length(chunks)
sjob <- slurm_apply(
f = function(i) {
try(do_all_parameters(parameters[chunks[[i]],],
over_write = FALSE,
cores = cpus,
wd = working_directory))
},
params = data.frame(i = 1:length(chunks)),
add_objects = c("do_all_parameters",
"parameters", "cpus",
"chunks", "number_of_chunks",
custom_functions),
jobname = "W_shredder",
nodes = number_of_chunks,
cpus_per_node = cpus,
slurm_options = sopt)
sessionInfo()
R version 3.5.1 (2018-07-02)
Platform: x86_64-apple-darwin15.6.0 (64-bit)
Running under: macOS High Sierra 10.13.6
Matrix products: default
BLAS: /Library/Frameworks/R.framework/Versions/3.5/Resources/lib/libRblas.0.dylib
LAPACK: /Library/Frameworks/R.framework/Versions/3.5/Resources/lib/libRlapack.dylib
locale:
[1] en_AU.UTF-8/en_AU.UTF-8/en_AU.UTF-8/C/en_AU.UTF-8/en_AU.UTF-8
attached base packages:
[1] stats graphics grDevices utils datasets methods base
loaded via a namespace (and not attached):
[1] workflowr_1.4.0 Rcpp_1.0.2 digest_0.6.20 rprojroot_1.3-2
[5] backports_1.1.2 git2r_0.23.0 magrittr_1.5 evaluate_0.14
[9] stringi_1.4.3 fs_1.3.1 whisker_0.3-2 rmarkdown_1.13
[13] tools_3.5.1 stringr_1.4.0 glue_1.3.1.9000 xfun_0.8
[17] yaml_2.2.0 compiler_3.5.1 htmltools_0.3.6 knitr_1.23