Occasionally your website may not display (or recent updates will not immediately appear), and you may even receive an email from GitHub with the following message:
The page build failed for the
masterbranch with the following error:
unable to build page. Please try again later.
For information on troubleshooting Jekyll see:
If you have any questions you can contact us by replying to this email.
If you’ve followed the setup instructions from the Getting started vignette, and especially if the website displayed in the past, it’s very unlikely that you caused the problem. The hosting is provided by GitHub Pages, and it sometimes is delayed or down. Overall for a free service, it is very reliable. If you wait 5 minutes (or 30 minutes at most), your website will likely be back to normal.
If you are anxious to know if there is a problem and when it will be resolved, you can check the status of the Twitter account GitHub Status for the most up-to-date reports from GitHub. If you suspect that the problem may have been caused by your recent changes to your website (again, this is unlikely), you can view the GitHub help page Troubleshooting GitHub Pages builds.
Short answer: No, not if you use the default setup that hosts the site on GitHub Pages. For an alternative setup, see the FAQ below that describes an option for securely sharing your workflowr site.
Long answer: Even if you create a private GitHub repository, the website it creates is still public. If you’re not ready to publish your results online, you can always wait and activate GitHub Pages later. In the meantime, you’ll still have a version-controlled, organized set of results for your project. However, the risk that someone that doesn’t have the link to your website is able to find it is very low. Search engines prioritize the results by how many other sites link to a site, so your website will not be high in the results even if you search for very specific terms. Thus if you only share the URL to your results with your close collaborators, and request that they not share it widely, your website is effectively private. That being said, being truly scooped in science is rare (at best) and openly sharing your work will help establish your expertise in the field (and furthermore establishes your priority), so you should consider keeping both your code and website public.
No, at least not in the standard setup. The website is hosted with GitHub pages, which only supports static web pages. Shiny apps are dynamic, i.e. a user can interact with them to change the content. The easiest way to share your Shiny app would be to host it at shinyapps.io and add a link to your app on your workflowr website. Alternatively you could host your workflowr website on your own server, but that would require much more knowledge and resources to accomplish.
Almost certainly yes, but some things are easier to customize than others. The vignette Customize your research website provides some ideas that are simple to implement. Check out the documentation for rmarkdown and Twitter Bootstrap for inspiration.
Yes! If you’d like to create a single HTML or PDF file to distribute an isolated analysis from your project, you can directly run the rmarkdown function
library("rmarkdown") # Create analysis/file.html render("analysis/file.Rmd", html_document()) # Create analysis/file.pdf render("analysis/file.Rmd", pdf_document())
There are two main caveats to this: